Isaaks v Charlton Triangle Homes Ltd
The lease and land register contained a mistake regarding the location of Flat 7; strong evidence established the parties’ common intention for the flat to be on the second floor. Rectification of the lease and alteration of the land register are warranted to correct this mistake, with no defences or exceptional circumstances present.
- Parties
- Claimant: James Julius Isaaks (by the Bank of Scotland PLC acting as attorney); Defendant: Charlton Triangle Homes Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Lease, Land Registration, Mistake in Register
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Julius Isaaks (by the Bank of Scotland PLC acting as attorney)
Claimant
Charlton Triangle Homes Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease should be rectified to reflect the correct floor of Flat 7 Games House
- 2 Whether the land register should be altered to correct the mistake
Ratio Decidendi
The lease and land register contained a mistake regarding the location of Flat 7; strong evidence established the parties’ common intention for the flat to be on the second floor. Rectification of the lease and alteration of the land register are warranted to correct this mistake, with no defences or exceptional circumstances present.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Rectification of the lease so all references to 'third floor flat' are amended to 'second floor flat'.
- Direction to the Chief Land Registrar to amend the land register accordingly, noting the deed of rectification and correcting the Schedule of Notice of Leases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment