Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform v Charter Financial Solutions Ltd & Ors
The court found that FSUK and related companies had been operated with a serious lack of commercial probity, including making blatant misrepresentations, misleading franchisees and the public, and concealing adverse business history. The directors demonstrated a willingness to act beyond the boundaries of law and regulation until compelled to stop. There was insufficient evidence of voluntary change in business practices. The court exercised its discretion to make winding up orders in the public interest under section 124A of the Insolvency Act 1986.
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform; Respondent: Charter Financial Solutions Limited; Respondent: Charter Financial Solutions (UK) Limited; Respondent: Finance Select (UK) Limited; Respondent: Bounce World Limited; Respondent: Trash Express (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Public Interest Company Winding Up Petition / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Winding up orders granted
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up on Public Interest Grounds, Commercial Probity, Misrepresentation, Consumer Protection, Franchise Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Petitioner
Charter Financial Solutions Limited
Respondent
Charter Financial Solutions (UK) Limited
Respondent
Finance Select (UK) Limited
Respondent
Bounce World Limited
Respondent
Trash Express (UK) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Public Interest Company Winding Up Petition / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Finance Select (UK) Limited (FSUK) and related companies should be wound up in the public interest under section 124A of the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether the business model and conduct of FSUK and related companies demonstrated a lack of commercial probity justifying winding up
- 3 Whether misleading statements and misrepresentations were made to franchisees and the public
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that FSUK and related companies had been operated with a serious lack of commercial probity, including making blatant misrepresentations, misleading franchisees and the public, and concealing adverse business history. The directors demonstrated a willingness to act beyond the boundaries of law and regulation until compelled to stop. There was insufficient evidence of voluntary change in business practices. The court exercised its discretion to make winding up orders in the public interest under section 124A of the Insolvency Act 1986.
Court Disposition
Winding up orders granted
Orders
- Finance Select (UK) Limited (FSUK) to be wound up in the public interest
- Charter Financial Solutions Limited (CFS) to be wound up
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment