Chelmer Housing Partnership (suing as CHP) v Ms E.V.Wheal (Eastern : To determine reasonableness and payability of service charges) [2015] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UF_LSC_2015_0041 (06 July 2015)

The tribunal determined whether the service charges were reasonable and payable in accordance with the lease and statutory requirements.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2015] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UF_LSC_2015_0041
Parties: Applicant: Chelmer Housing Partnership (suing as CHP); Respondent: Ms E. V. Wheal
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 06 July 2015
Procedural Posture: First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) / Determination of Reasonableness and Payability of Service Charges
Outcome: Determination made on reasonableness and payability of service charges.
Legal Topics: Service Charges, Reasonableness of Charges, Payability of Charges

Property Law Service Charges Reasonableness of Charges Payability of Charges

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Chelmer Housing Partnership (suing as CHP)

Applicant

Ms E. V. Wheal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) / Determination of Reasonableness and Payability of Service Charges

Legal Issues

1 Whether the service charges claimed by the landlord are reasonable and payable by the tenant

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the service charges were reasonable and payable in accordance with the lease and statutory requirements.

Court Disposition

Determination made on reasonableness and payability of service charges.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.