Cheng v Government of the United States of America
The conduct alleged against the appellant constituted extradition offences under UK law, specifically conspiracy to defraud, and all counts concerned the same criminal enterprise. The Secretary of State was entitled to make the extradition order without further assurance, as specialty would be observed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Cheng; First Respondent: Government of the United States of America; Second Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Appeal Against District Judge's Decision and Secretary of State's Extradition Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extradition Offences, Specialty Principle, Conspiracy to Defraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheng
Appellant
Government of the United States of America
First Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Appeal Against District Judge's Decision and Secretary of State's Extradition Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conduct alleged constitutes extradition offences under UK law
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State should have obtained an assurance regarding prosecution only for conspiracy to defraud
Ratio Decidendi
The conduct alleged against the appellant constituted extradition offences under UK law, specifically conspiracy to defraud, and all counts concerned the same criminal enterprise. The Secretary of State was entitled to make the extradition order without further assurance, as specialty would be observed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against District Judge's decision dismissed
- Appeal against Secretary of State's extradition order dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment