Richmond Pharmacology Ltd v Chester Overseas Ltd & Ors
After disclosure and inspection, the claimant's continued pursuit of a broadly pleaded and grossly exaggerated claim, including serving an expert report attributing all losses to the defendants' alleged breaches, was unreasonable to a high degree and sufficiently out of the norm to justify assessment of the defendants' costs on the indemnity basis from 1 December 2013 onward.
- Parties
- Claimant: Richmond Pharmacology Limited; Defendant: Chester Overseas Limited; Defendant: Milton Levine; Defendant: Larry Levine
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Defendants' application for indemnity costs granted in part.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Costs, Indemnity Costs, Standard Basis Costs, Unreasonable Conduct in Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richmond Pharmacology Limited
Claimant
Chester Overseas Limited
Defendant
Milton Levine
Defendant
Larry Levine
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants' costs should be assessed on the indemnity basis due to the claimant's conduct
- 2 Whether the claimant's pursuit of the claim was unreasonable to a high degree
Ratio Decidendi
After disclosure and inspection, the claimant's continued pursuit of a broadly pleaded and grossly exaggerated claim, including serving an expert report attributing all losses to the defendants' alleged breaches, was unreasonable to a high degree and sufficiently out of the norm to justify assessment of the defendants' costs on the indemnity basis from 1 December 2013 onward.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application for indemnity costs granted in part.
Orders
- Defendants' costs to be assessed on the standard basis up to 30 November 2013.
- Defendants' costs from 1 December 2013 to be assessed on the indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment