Secretary of State for the Home Department, R (on the application of) v Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator
The Asylum Support Adjudicator has jurisdiction under section 103(1) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 to hear appeals against decisions that an applicant does not qualify for support, including where the Secretary of State's refusal is based on the applicant not being an asylum seeker. The statutory right of appeal is not limited to those who are asylum seekers as defined, but applies to any applicant for section 95 support.
- Parties
- Claimant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Defendant: Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator; Interested Party: Flutura Malaj
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum Support, Jurisdiction of Adjudicators, Right of Appeal, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Claimant
Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator
Defendant
Flutura Malaj
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator has jurisdiction to hear an appeal under section 103(1) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 when the Secretary of State refuses support on the basis that the applicant is not an asylum seeker.
Ratio Decidendi
The Asylum Support Adjudicator has jurisdiction under section 103(1) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 to hear appeals against decisions that an applicant does not qualify for support, including where the Secretary of State's refusal is based on the applicant not being an asylum seeker. The statutory right of appeal is not limited to those who are asylum seekers as defined, but applies to any applicant for section 95 support.
Court Disposition
Claim for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- The claim for judicial review is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment