Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, R (on the application of) v The Chief Schools Adjudicator [2000] EWHC 635 (Admin) (14 December 2000)
The adjudicator's determination was not irrational, did not omit any statutory or fundamental material considerations, and gave proper regard to the statutory code of practice. The adjudicator acted within jurisdiction and lawfully concluded that fairness required the expression of parental preference to precede grammar school selection tests in Wirral's admission arrangements.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC 635 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Wirral Borough Metropolitan Council; Defendant: Chief Schools Adjudicator
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- School Admissions, Statutory Interpretation, Procedural Fairness, Public Law Grounds, Code of Practice Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wirral Borough Metropolitan Council
Claimant
Chief Schools Adjudicator
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator's determination on Wirral's school admission arrangements was irrational or failed to consider material considerations
- 2 Whether the adjudicator failed to give due weight to the statutory code of practice under section 84 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
- 3 Whether the adjudicator's decision was within jurisdiction and lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator's determination was not irrational, did not omit any statutory or fundamental material considerations, and gave proper regard to the statutory code of practice. The adjudicator acted within jurisdiction and lawfully concluded that fairness required the expression of parental preference to precede grammar school selection tests in Wirral's admission arrangements.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Claimant to pay defendant's costs in the sum of £7,955
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment