Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission v Mitchell & Anor
The Limitation Act 1980 does not bar an application under section 39A of the Child Support Act 1991 because such an application is not an action to recover a sum of money but is for enforcement by committal or driving disqualification, which are not proceedings for money claims.
- Parties
- Appellant: Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission; Respondent: David Mitchell; Interested Party: Sonia Clements
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Child Maintenance, Limitation Periods, Enforcement of Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Appellant
David Mitchell
Respondent
Sonia Clements
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Limitation Act 1980 bar an application under section 39A of the Child Support Act 1991 for committal or driving disqualification?
- 2 Is an application under section 39A an 'action to recover any sum recoverable by virtue of any enactment' within section 9 of the Limitation Act 1980?
Ratio Decidendi
The Limitation Act 1980 does not bar an application under section 39A of the Child Support Act 1991 because such an application is not an action to recover a sum of money but is for enforcement by committal or driving disqualification, which are not proceedings for money claims.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of His Honour Judge Vincent set aside
- Application under section 39A not statute barred by Limitation Act 1980
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment