Howes, R (on the application of) v Child Support Commissioners & Anor
The Commissioner failed to take proper account of the claimant's early attempts to appeal and the procedural confusion, omitting material considerations from the balancing exercise required under regulation 11(3), rendering the decision irrational.
- Parties
- Claimant: Brian Dimon Peter Howes; Defendant: Child Support Commissioners; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Decision of the Child Support Commissioner quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Child Support Appeals, Procedural Time Limits, Extension of Time, Special Reasons for Late Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Dimon Peter Howes
Claimant
Child Support Commissioners
Defendant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Child Support Commissioner erred in refusing to accept a late application for leave to appeal
- 2 Whether the Commissioner failed to consider all material factors in exercising discretion under regulation 11(3) of the Child Support Commissioners (Procedure) Regulations 1999
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner failed to take proper account of the claimant's early attempts to appeal and the procedural confusion, omitting material considerations from the balancing exercise required under regulation 11(3), rendering the decision irrational.
Court Disposition
Decision of the Child Support Commissioner quashed.
Orders
- Matter remitted for further consideration by a Commissioner.
- Further submissions on disposal invited; parties may agree an order for approval.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment