R v Chloe Maria May
The seriousness of the offence, involving sustained, planned, and cruel conduct with devastating impact on victims, outweighed personal mitigation and impact on dependants. Appropriate punishment could only be achieved by immediate custody, and the sentence could not be suspended.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Chloe Maria May
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, False Allegation of Rape, Sentencing, Suspension of Custodial Sentence, Impact on Dependants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Chloe Maria May
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of imprisonment for perverting the course of justice should have been suspended due to personal mitigation and impact on dependants
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the offence, involving sustained, planned, and cruel conduct with devastating impact on victims, outweighed personal mitigation and impact on dependants. Appropriate punishment could only be achieved by immediate custody, and the sentence could not be suspended.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment upheld
- Restraining Order remains in force
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment