Davis v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
Field Shelter C and associated structures constituted permanent buildings requiring planning permission; the Inspector applied the correct legal tests and reasoning, and the appellant failed to demonstrate error of law or very special circumstances justifying the development in the Green Belt.
- Parties
- Appellant: Christine Davis; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Respondent: Lichfield District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Planning Appeal Under S 289 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Green Belt Development, Enforcement Notice, Planning Permission, Operational Development, Interpretation of Planning Conditions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christine Davis
Appellant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Respondent
Lichfield District Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Planning Appeal Under S 289 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Field Shelter C constituted a permanent building requiring planning permission
- 2 Whether the Inspector erred in not granting planning permission for the structures
- 3 Whether the Inspector should have made a split decision on the deemed application
Ratio Decidendi
Field Shelter C and associated structures constituted permanent buildings requiring planning permission; the Inspector applied the correct legal tests and reasoning, and the appellant failed to demonstrate error of law or very special circumstances justifying the development in the Green Belt.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment