Cheltenham Borough Council v Laird
The court found Mrs Laird's answers to the medical questionnaire were not false or misleading when construed as a reasonable layperson would understand them. Even if false, she honestly believed them to be true and was not negligent. No actionable misrepresentation was established. CBC's claim for damages failed....
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cheltenham Borough Council; Defendant: Christine Susan Laird
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (employment/misrepresentation) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Employment Contract Formation, Damages, Limitation, Disability Discrimination, Harassment, Set Off, Vicarious Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheltenham Borough Council
Claimant
Christine Susan Laird
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (employment/misrepresentation) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employment contract was formed and on what terms
- 2 Whether Mrs Laird made false representations in her medical questionnaire
- 3 Whether any such representations were made fraudulently or negligently
Ratio Decidendi
The court found Mrs Laird's answers to the medical questionnaire were not false or misleading when construed as a reasonable layperson would understand them. Even if false, she honestly believed them to be true and was not negligent. No actionable misrepresentation was established. CBC's claim for damages failed. Mrs Laird's counterclaim for breach of duty by CBC also failed as no loss was proven.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim by Cheltenham Borough Council dismissed in full
- No damages awarded to either party
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment