Christopher Billings v The Information Commissioner
Hampshire Constabulary was not entitled to rely on section 30(3) FOIA to refuse to confirm or deny holding information relating to the review of the investigation (Request 4) and the application for a Court Order (Request 6), as the public interest in confirmation or denial outweighs the public interest in...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Billings; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act, Public Interest Test, Police Investigations, Duty to Confirm or Deny
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Billings
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Hampshire Constabulary was entitled to rely on section 30(3) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse to confirm or deny holding information relating to specific requests
- 2 Whether the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in confirming or denying whether information is held
Ratio Decidendi
Hampshire Constabulary was not entitled to rely on section 30(3) FOIA to refuse to confirm or deny holding information relating to the review of the investigation (Request 4) and the application for a Court Order (Request 6), as the public interest in confirmation or denial outweighs the public interest in maintaining the exemption. For the remainder of the requests, section 30(3) FOIA was properly engaged and the public interest favored maintaining the exemption.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Hampshire Constabulary must confirm or deny whether information is held relating to the review of the investigation (Request 4) and the application for a Court Order (Request 6) within 35 days of this decision, or within 28 days after notification of an unsuccessful appeal.
- Failure to comply may result in certification to the Upper Tribunal and may be dealt with as contempt of court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment