Dixon & Anor v Blindley Heath Investments Ltd & Anor
The parties were estopped by convention from relying on pre-emption rights to block the share transfer; the board's unanimous approval at the October 2011 meeting entitled the transferee to registration; the mis-description of the transferee was a mere misnomer and did not invalidate the transfer; appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Charles Dixon; Appellant: EFI (Loughton) Limited; Respondent/cross Appellant: Blindley Heath Investments Limited; Respondent to Cross Appeal: Peter Bass; Respondent to Cross Appeal: Annette Bass; Respondent to Cross Appeal: Robert Bass; Respondent to Cross Appeal: Catherine Anne Bass; Respondent to Cross Appeal: Michael Bashford; Respondent to Cross Appeal: Suzanne Bashford; Respondent to Cross Appeal: David James Mingay; Respondent as to Costs Only: Gerald Fred Clarke; Respondent as to Costs Only: Richard Philip Wells
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal on substantive claims redundant; permission granted for costs appeals.
- Legal Topics
- Estoppel by Convention, Pre Emption Rights, Share Transfer, Board Resolutions, Misrepresentation, Breach of Warranty, Duomatic Principle, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Charles Dixon
Appellant
EFI (Loughton) Limited
Appellant
Blindley Heath Investments Limited
Respondent/cross Appellant
Peter Bass
Respondent to Cross Appeal
Annette Bass
Respondent to Cross Appeal
Robert Bass
Respondent to Cross Appeal
Catherine Anne Bass
Respondent to Cross Appeal
Michael Bashford
Respondent to Cross Appeal
Suzanne Bashford
Respondent to Cross Appeal
David James Mingay
Respondent to Cross Appeal
Gerald Fred Clarke
Respondent as to Costs Only
Richard Philip Wells
Respondent as to Costs Only
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether estoppel by convention prevents enforcement of pre-emption rights in share transfers
- 2 Whether board approval at the October 2011 meeting was binding
- 3 Whether the board could revoke approval at the November 2011 meeting
Ratio Decidendi
The parties were estopped by convention from relying on pre-emption rights to block the share transfer; the board's unanimous approval at the October 2011 meeting entitled the transferee to registration; the mis-description of the transferee was a mere misnomer and did not invalidate the transfer; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal on substantive claims redundant; permission granted for costs appeals.
Orders
- Blindley Heath Investments Limited entitled to be registered as member in respect of Sale Shares
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment