Galazi & Anor v Christoforou & Ors
The claimants discontinued their entire claims against Anglo and Northwest and partially discontinued claims against the Christo Defendants. The default rule applies: the claimants must pay the defendants' costs of the discontinued claims and the costs of and occasioned by the amendments, all on the indemnity basis. There is no good reason to depart from the default rule, and postponement of the costs decision is inappropriate. Reserved costs are determined as specified for each application.
- Parties
- Claimant: Maria Galazi; Claimant: Iphegenia Galazis; Defendant: Christopher Christoforou; Defendant: Christo & Co Limited; Defendant: YVA Solicitors (a firm); Defendant: Anglo Properties Limited; Defendant: Northwest Enterprises Limited; Defendant: Christodoulos Galazis; Third Party/claimant (in BL 2018 001875): Wellsford Securities Limited; Claimant (in BL 2018 001875): Abbee Limited; Defendant (in BL 2018 001875): C Christo & Co Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (property/trusts/company) / Costs Determination Following Amendment and Partial Discontinuance
- Outcome
- Costs orders made; claimants to pay defendants' costs of discontinued claims and amendments on indemnity basis; reserved costs determined as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Consequences of Discontinuance, Amendment of Pleadings, Indemnity Costs, Restoration of Companies, Freezing Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maria Galazi
Claimant
Iphegenia Galazis
Claimant
Christopher Christoforou
Defendant
Christo & Co Limited
Defendant
YVA Solicitors (a firm)
Defendant
Anglo Properties Limited
Defendant
Northwest Enterprises Limited
Defendant
Christodoulos Galazis
Defendant
Wellsford Securities Limited
Third Party/claimant (in BL 2018 001875)
Abbee Limited
Claimant (in BL 2018 001875)
C Christo & Co Limited
Defendant (in BL 2018 001875)
Procedural Posture
Civil (property/trusts/company) / Costs Determination Following Amendment and Partial Discontinuance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants have discontinued all or part of their claims by amending pleadings
- 2 What costs consequences flow from the amendment and discontinuance
- 3 Whether costs should be paid on the standard or indemnity basis
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants discontinued their entire claims against Anglo and Northwest and partially discontinued claims against the Christo Defendants. The default rule applies: the claimants must pay the defendants' costs of the discontinued claims and the costs of and occasioned by the amendments, all on the indemnity basis. There is no good reason to depart from the default rule, and postponement of the costs decision is inappropriate. Reserved costs are determined as specified for each application.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made; claimants to pay defendants' costs of discontinued claims and amendments on indemnity basis; reserved costs determined as specified.
Orders
- Galazi Claimants to pay the costs of Anglo and Northwest on indemnity basis, subject to detailed assessment.
- Galazi Claimants to pay the Christo Defendants' costs of discontinued claims and amendments on indemnity basis, subject to detailed assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment