R v Christopher Clark
The original committal for trial of the breach offence was invalid due to procedural error; the Divisional Court quashed the sending and regularised the committal. The sentence of two years' imprisonment for breach of a restraining order, with three months concurrent for common assault, was justified and proportionate given the seriousness, persistence, and aggravating features. The appeal against sentence was dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Clark; Respondent: Rex (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence and Judicial Review of Committal Procedure
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; sentence regularised and re-imposed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Restraining Order, Common Assault, Committal Procedure, Sentencing, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Clark
Appellant
Rex (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence and Judicial Review of Committal Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for breach of a restraining order was lawful given procedural irregularities in committal from the Magistrates' Court to the Crown Court
- 2 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The original committal for trial of the breach offence was invalid due to procedural error; the Divisional Court quashed the sending and regularised the committal. The sentence of two years' imprisonment for breach of a restraining order, with three months concurrent for common assault, was justified and proportionate given the seriousness, persistence, and aggravating features. The appeal against sentence was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; sentence regularised and re-imposed
Orders
- Quashing of original sending for trial of breach offence by Magistrates' Court
- Committal for sentence regularised under section 14 of the Sentencing Act 2020
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment