Docherty -Puncheon, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 2027 (29 October 2013)
The judge's directions to the jury regarding prior inconsistent statements were adequate and any omission did not render the conviction unsafe. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the seriousness of the offences and the applicant's criminal history.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Crim 2027
- Parties
- Applicant: Christopher Docherty-Puncheon; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Admissibility of Evidence, Prior Inconsistent Statements, Minimum Term Sentencing, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Docherty-Puncheon
Applicant
Regina (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction is unsafe due to the judge's failure to direct the jury on the evidential status of prior inconsistent statements under section 119 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether the minimum term of 32 years imposed was manifestly excessive given the circumstances and time already served
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's directions to the jury regarding prior inconsistent statements were adequate and any omission did not render the conviction unsafe. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the seriousness of the offences and the applicant's criminal history.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused.
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment