Mussell & Anor v Patience & Anor
Claimants as executors did not act improperly or unreasonably; they are entitled to recover the balance of their costs (the remaining 20%) from the estate on the indemnity basis, in addition to the 80% payable by defendants under the litigation costs order.
- Parties
- Claimant: Anita Doreen Mussell; Claimant: David Keith Williams; Defendant: Christopher Edward Keith Patience; Defendant: Veronica Lesley Patience
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Ruling After Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimants entitled to 80% of their costs from defendants on the standard basis; remaining 20% recoverable from the estate on the indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Executor Indemnity, Costs Orders, Estate Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anita Doreen Mussell
Claimant
David Keith Williams
Claimant
Christopher Edward Keith Patience
Defendant
Veronica Lesley Patience
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Ruling After Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants as executors are entitled to indemnity for costs from the estate beyond litigation costs order
- 2 Whether claimants acted improperly or unreasonably so as to lose indemnity
- 3 Classification of dispute as trust dispute or beneficiaries dispute
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants as executors did not act improperly or unreasonably; they are entitled to recover the balance of their costs (the remaining 20%) from the estate on the indemnity basis, in addition to the 80% payable by defendants under the litigation costs order.
Court Disposition
Claimants entitled to 80% of their costs from defendants on the standard basis; remaining 20% recoverable from the estate on the indemnity basis.
Orders
- Defendants to pay claimants’ costs of the application dated 15 February 2018 on the standard basis, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
- Defendants to pay 80% of claimants’ costs of the claim on the standard basis, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment