Fletcher, R. v
The sentencing judge correctly applied the relevant guidelines, considered aggravating features, and properly applied the totality principle; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Christopher Fletcher
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeal, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Appeal Totality Principle
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Christopher Fletcher
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the total sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge correctly applied the totality principle
- 3 Whether aggravating features justified the starting point and consecutive sentences
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge correctly applied the relevant guidelines, considered aggravating features, and properly applied the totality principle; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment