Thomas v R [2009] EWCA Crim 904 (01 May 2009)
The sentencing judge was entitled to assess the seriousness of the murder in the context of a proven pattern of prolonged domestic violence towards the victim, and to reflect this in the minimum term, provided he did not sentence for uncharged offences against other individuals. The sentence was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Crim 904
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Gwyn Thomas; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Domestic Violence, Minimum Term Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Gwyn Thomas
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge was entitled to consider prior criminal activity not resulting in conviction when fixing the minimum term for murder
- 2 Whether the aggravating features were properly applied in determining the minimum term
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to assess the seriousness of the murder in the context of a proven pattern of prolonged domestic violence towards the victim, and to reflect this in the minimum term, provided he did not sentence for uncharged offences against other individuals. The sentence was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment