Lovegrove, R. v
The court held that ASBOs must be necessary and proportionate, and that sentencing for breach of an ASBO is a distinct statutory offence with its own maximum penalty, not limited by the maximum for the underlying criminal offence. The court reduced the duration and scope of one ASBO, upheld a custodial sentence for breach of another, and quashed an ASBO that was not justified by the evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Henchcliffe; Appellant: Cyril John Stevens; Appellant: David Lee Lovegrove; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- partially allowed and partially dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Anti Social Behaviour Orders, Sentencing, Breach of Court Orders, Proportionality in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Henchcliffe
Appellant
Cyril John Stevens
Appellant
David Lee Lovegrove
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriateness and duration of Anti-social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs)
- 2 Proportionality of sentences for breach of ASBOs compared to underlying offences
- 3 Necessity of ASBOs in light of other available sanctions
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that ASBOs must be necessary and proportionate, and that sentencing for breach of an ASBO is a distinct statutory offence with its own maximum penalty, not limited by the maximum for the underlying criminal offence. The court reduced the duration and scope of one ASBO, upheld a custodial sentence for breach of another, and quashed an ASBO that was not justified by the evidence.
Court Disposition
partially allowed and partially dismissed
Orders
- Christopher Henchcliffe: ASBO duration reduced to 5 years and scope limited to the victim's street; custodial sentence upheld.
- Cyril John Stevens: Appeal against sentence for breach of ASBO dismissed; custodial sentence upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment