Mintern, R. v [2004] EWCA Crim 7 (21 January 2004)

Mintern, R. v [2004] EWCA Crim 7 (21 January 2004)

The indictment was not duplicitous in form; the trial judge properly directed the jury on the need to find a single conspiracy; no unfairness or prejudice was caused to the appellant by the proceedings or the acquittal of co-defendants; the evidence against Mintern justified the refusal to direct an acquittal.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Crim 7
Parties
Respondent: The Queen; Appellant: Christopher John Mintern
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy, Burglary, Arson, Attempted Criminal Damage, Duplicity in Indictment, Fair Trial, No Case to Answer
Criminal Law Conspiracy Burglary Arson Attempted Criminal Damage Duplicity in Indictment Fair Trial No Case to Answer

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Respondent

Christopher John Mintern

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the indictment was duplicitous due to evidence of multiple conspiracies
  2. 2 Whether the trial was unfair following the acquittal of a co-defendant and amendment of particulars
  3. 3 Whether the appellant should have been acquitted on a count where a co-defendant was acquitted on similar evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The indictment was not duplicitous in form; the trial judge properly directed the jury on the need to find a single conspiracy; no unfairness or prejudice was caused to the appellant by the proceedings or the acquittal of co-defendants; the evidence against Mintern justified the refusal to direct an acquittal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence upheld
  • No order as to costs