Wilby, R v

Wilby, R v

The minimum term of 20 years was manifestly excessive because the judge appeared to treat intent to kill as an aggravating factor, which is already incorporated in the statutory starting point, and did not give sufficient credit for the guilty plea and mitigating factors. The appropriate minimum term is 18 years, less time spent on remand.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Christopher Keith Wilby
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 September 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing, Minimum Term, Aggravating Factors, Mitigating Factors, Guilty Plea
Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Minimum Term Aggravating Factors Mitigating Factors Guilty Plea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Christopher Keith Wilby

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in treating intent to kill as an aggravating factor when setting the minimum term for murder
  2. 2 Whether sufficient credit was given for the appellant's guilty plea and mitigating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The minimum term of 20 years was manifestly excessive because the judge appeared to treat intent to kill as an aggravating factor, which is already incorporated in the statutory starting point, and did not give sufficient credit for the guilty plea and mitigating factors. The appropriate minimum term is 18 years, less time spent on remand.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • The 20-year minimum term is quashed and substituted with an 18-year minimum term, less time spent in custody on remand.