Lamb, R. v
A custodial sentence of 22 months for repeated breaches of an ASBO, where the breaches did not involve harassment, alarm, or distress to the public, was disproportionate. The appropriate sentence is three consecutive terms of two months' imprisonment, reflecting the need to uphold court orders but also the absence of actual antisocial behaviour.
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Lamb; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Antisocial Behaviour Orders (asbo), Sentencing, Breach of Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Lamb
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for repeated breaches of an antisocial behaviour order where the breaches do not involve harassment, alarm, or distress?
- 2 Should custodial sentences for breach of ASBOs be proportionate to the actual social impact of the breach?
Ratio Decidendi
A custodial sentence of 22 months for repeated breaches of an ASBO, where the breaches did not involve harassment, alarm, or distress to the public, was disproportionate. The appropriate sentence is three consecutive terms of two months' imprisonment, reflecting the need to uphold court orders but also the absence of actual antisocial behaviour.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence reduced
Orders
- Sentence of 22 months imprisonment quashed
- For each of the three offences of breach of ASBO, a sentence of 2 months imprisonment imposed, to run consecutively
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment