Boyle & Anor, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 2101 (25 August 2006)

Boyle & Anor, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 2101 (25 August 2006)

Despite deficiencies in the s.34 direction, the overwhelming evidence against the appellants and the context of the direction given meant that no injustice occurred and the convictions were safe.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] EWCA Crim 2101
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Christopher Michael Boyle; Appellant: David Ford
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 August 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld.
Legal Topics
Adverse Inferences From Silence, Murder, Jury Directions, Non Disclosure, Safety of Conviction
Criminal Law Adverse Inferences From Silence Murder Jury Directions Non Disclosure Safety of Conviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Christopher Michael Boyle

Appellant

David Ford

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's direction to the jury regarding adverse inferences from silence under s.34 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 was a significant misdirection rendering the convictions unsafe
  2. 2 Whether non-disclosure by the prosecution regarding a witness's car possession affected the safety of the conviction

Ratio Decidendi

Despite deficiencies in the s.34 direction, the overwhelming evidence against the appellants and the context of the direction given meant that no injustice occurred and the convictions were safe.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld.