Hodges v Naish (Rev1) [2021] EWHC 1805 (QB) (01 July 2021)
The defendant published defamatory statements to Conor Kennedy, John McCullough, and Kevin Goble, imputing criminal conduct and professional misconduct, which are actionable as slander per se without proof of special damage. The words were statements of fact, not opinion, and caused serious harm to the claimant's reputation. The claim regarding publication to Elaine Walker failed due to lack of evidence.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1805
- Parties
- Claimant: Jamie Hodges; Defendant: Christopher Naish
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Slander Action / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Claim partially succeeds
- Legal Topics
- Slander, Serious Harm, Defamatory Meaning, Actionability Per Se, Limitation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jamie Hodges
Claimant
Christopher Naish
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Slander Action / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant published defamatory words to specified individuals
- 2 Whether the words were statements of fact or opinion
- 3 Whether the words were actionable as slander per se
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant published defamatory statements to Conor Kennedy, John McCullough, and Kevin Goble, imputing criminal conduct and professional misconduct, which are actionable as slander per se without proof of special damage. The words were statements of fact, not opinion, and caused serious harm to the claimant's reputation. The claim regarding publication to Elaine Walker failed due to lack of evidence.
Court Disposition
Claim partially succeeds
Orders
- Claim for slander in respect of publications to Conor Kennedy, John McCullough, and Kevin Goble succeeds
- Claim for publication to Elaine Walker dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment