R v Christopher Nigel Doughty

R v Christopher Nigel Doughty

The bad character evidence was properly admitted under section 101(1)(d) as relevant to the identity of the phone user and the purpose of communications. The sentence was not excessive given the applicant's criminal history, role, and aggravating factors. Disparity with co-offenders does not justify reduction where guidelines are followed.

Parties
Prosecution: R Ex; Applicant: Christopher Nigel Doughty
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Legal Topics
Bad Character Evidence, Extended Sentence, Assisting or Encouraging Crime, Unauthorised Possession in Prison, Sentencing Guidelines, Disparity in Sentencing
Criminal Law Bad Character Evidence Extended Sentence Assisting or Encouraging Crime Unauthorised Possession in Prison Sentencing Guidelines Disparity in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R Ex

Prosecution

Christopher Nigel Doughty

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 admissibility of bad character evidence
  2. 2 whether sentence was excessive
  3. 3 whether applicant's role was akin to principal conspirator

Ratio Decidendi

The bad character evidence was properly admitted under section 101(1)(d) as relevant to the identity of the phone user and the purpose of communications. The sentence was not excessive given the applicant's criminal history, role, and aggravating factors. Disparity with co-offenders does not justify reduction where guidelines are followed.

Court Disposition

applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused

Orders

  • extensions of time granted
  • renewed applications for leave to appeal refused