Pearce, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 466 (09 March 2021)

Pearce, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 466 (09 March 2021)

Although the judge erred in referring to an unproven incident as an aggravating factor, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the multiple aggravating features, the pattern of controlling and coercive behaviour, and the impact on the victim.

Citation
[2021] EWCA Crim 466
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Christopher Pearce
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Controlling or Coercive Behaviour, Sentencing, Domestic Abuse, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
Criminal Law Controlling or Coercive Behaviour Sentencing Domestic Abuse Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Christopher Pearce

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred by treating unproven pre-indictment conduct as an aggravating factor
  2. 2 Whether the categorisation of harm as 'greater harm' was justified in the absence of psychological evidence
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

Although the judge erred in referring to an unproven incident as an aggravating factor, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the multiple aggravating features, the pattern of controlling and coercive behaviour, and the impact on the victim.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of 30 months' imprisonment and 10-year restraining order affirmed