Simmons v Castle

Simmons v Castle

The court approved the settlement and declared that, with effect from 1 April 2013, the proper level of general damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenity in personal injury and other torts causing suffering, inconvenience, or distress will be 10% higher than previously, in line with civil costs reforms.

Parties
Appellant: Christopher Simmons; Respondent: Derek Castle
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Approve Settlement of Appeal
Outcome
settlement approved
Legal Topics
General Damages, Settlement Approval, Civil Costs Reform
Tort Personal Injury General Damages Settlement Approval Civil Costs Reform

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Simmons

Appellant

Derek Castle

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Approve Settlement of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the settlement of the appeal should be approved
  2. 2 Appropriate measure of general damages in tort actions
  3. 3 Implementation of 10% increase in general damages

Ratio Decidendi

The court approved the settlement and declared that, with effect from 1 April 2013, the proper level of general damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenity in personal injury and other torts causing suffering, inconvenience, or distress will be 10% higher than previously, in line with civil costs reforms.

Court Disposition

settlement approved

Orders

  • Award totalling £24,712.72 maintained.
  • Appellant entitled to apply for further damages if fulminant septicaemia results in long-term disabling illness or death causing significant ongoing recoverable loss of earnings.