Christopher Stevens v The Information Commissioner
The tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Commissioner's outcome or to grant the remedies sought under section 166 DPA 2018, nor can it consider FOIA or Equality Act 2010 issues in this context. The application has no reasonable prospects of success and must be struck out.
- Parties
- Applicant: Christopher Stevens; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Section 166 DPA 2018 Application / Strike Out Application Determined
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Section 166 DPA 2018 Applications, Jurisdiction of First Tier Tribunal, FOIA Applicability to Private Bodies, Public Sector Equality Duty, Subject Access Requests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Stevens
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 166 DPA 2018 Application / Strike Out Application Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Commissioner's outcome under section 166 DPA 2018
- 2 Whether the tribunal can consider issues under the Equality Act 2010
- 3 Whether the tribunal can consider FOIA issues against a private insurer
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Commissioner's outcome or to grant the remedies sought under section 166 DPA 2018, nor can it consider FOIA or Equality Act 2010 issues in this context. The application has no reasonable prospects of success and must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application under section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018 is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment