Linvale Investments Ltd v Walker [2016] EWHC B15 (Ch) (04 February 2016)
The right of way is implied by necessity to give effect to the common intention of the parties at the time of transfer, as the use of the fire exits and gravel pathway was necessary for the contemplated use and full occupation of the property, even though no right arose under section 62 or Wheeldon v Burrows due to lack of evidence of user.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC B15 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Linvale Investments Limited; Defendant: Christopher Walker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Implied Easements, Right of Way, Land Transfer, Fire Safety Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Linvale Investments Limited
Claimant
Christopher Walker
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Linvale Investments Limited has the benefit of a right of way over a gravel pathway on land owned by Mr Walker for emergency fire exit purposes
- 2 Whether such a right arises under section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows, or by implication from the parties' common intention
Ratio Decidendi
The right of way is implied by necessity to give effect to the common intention of the parties at the time of transfer, as the use of the fire exits and gravel pathway was necessary for the contemplated use and full occupation of the property, even though no right arose under section 62 or Wheeldon v Burrows due to lack of evidence of user.
Court Disposition
claim allowed in part
Orders
- Declaration that the claimant is entitled to a right of way over the gravel pathway from the three fire doors for emergency egress, in terms similar to the express right granted to Tyreweb.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment