Charles, R v
The burden of proving absence of reasonable excuse under s.1(10) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 rests on the prosecution once the defendant has raised the issue; the legal burden does not shift to the defence.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Chuks Emmanuel Charles
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no retrial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Anti Social Behaviour Orders (asbo), Reasonable Excuse, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Chuks Emmanuel Charles
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the legal burden of proving absence of reasonable excuse under s.1(10) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 rests on the prosecution or the defence
Ratio Decidendi
The burden of proving absence of reasonable excuse under s.1(10) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 rests on the prosecution once the defendant has raised the issue; the legal burden does not shift to the defence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no retrial ordered.
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- No retrial ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment