Charles, R v

Charles, R v

The burden of proving absence of reasonable excuse under s.1(10) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 rests on the prosecution once the defendant has raised the issue; the legal burden does not shift to the defence.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Chuks Emmanuel Charles
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no retrial ordered.
Legal Topics
Burden of Proof, Anti Social Behaviour Orders (asbo), Reasonable Excuse, Statutory Interpretation
Criminal Law Burden of Proof Anti Social Behaviour Orders (asbo) Reasonable Excuse Statutory Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Chuks Emmanuel Charles

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court

  1. 1 Whether the legal burden of proving absence of reasonable excuse under s.1(10) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 rests on the prosecution or the defence

Ratio Decidendi

The burden of proving absence of reasonable excuse under s.1(10) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 rests on the prosecution once the defendant has raised the issue; the legal burden does not shift to the defence.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no retrial ordered.

Orders

  • Conviction quashed
  • No retrial ordered