CIEL Ltd and another v Central Water Authority (Mauritius)
Appellants failed to prove unconditional water rights; water is public property and cannot be owned or transferred absolutely; CWA is entitled to levy charges for water use under statutory authority; prescription does not bar CWA's claim.
- Parties
- Appellant: CIEL Ltd; Appellant: Floréal Manufacturing Ltd (now Tropic Knits Ltd); Respondent: Central Water Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Water Rights, Prescription, Statutory Interpretation, Public Property, Charges for Water Use
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CIEL Ltd
Appellant
Floréal Manufacturing Ltd (now Tropic Knits Ltd)
Appellant
Central Water Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellants have ownership or unconditional rights to water from River Tatamaka and Réunion Canal
- 2 Whether CWA is entitled to levy charges for water use
- 3 Whether CWA's claim is barred by prescription
Ratio Decidendi
Appellants failed to prove unconditional water rights; water is public property and cannot be owned or transferred absolutely; CWA is entitled to levy charges for water use under statutory authority; prescription does not bar CWA's claim.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment on liability for water charges entered against TKL (successor to Floréal Manufacturing Ltd)
- If dispute remains on amount payable, matter remitted to Supreme Court of Mauritius for determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment