Imamovic v Cinergy Global Trading Ltd

Imamovic v Cinergy Global Trading Ltd

There was no partnership or agency between CGTL and Energa under English law, no holding out or ratification by CGTL, and no breach of duty to co-operate. Dr Imamovic contracted only with Energa and failed to produce viable offers or expenses. CGTL is not liable to Dr Imamovic under the contract or otherwise.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Dr Nedzad Imamovic; Defendant: Cinergy Global Trading Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Action / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Partnership Existence, Agency Authority, Contractual Liability, Breach of Contract, Duty to Co Operate
Contract Law Partnership Law Agency Law Partnership Existence Agency Authority Contractual Liability Breach of Contract Duty to Co Operate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Nedzad Imamovic

Claimant

Cinergy Global Trading Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Action / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a partnership existed between CGTL and Energa under English law
  2. 2 Whether Energa acted as agent for CGTL in contracting with Dr Imamovic
  3. 3 Whether CGTL held out Energa as its partner or agent

Ratio Decidendi

There was no partnership or agency between CGTL and Energa under English law, no holding out or ratification by CGTL, and no breach of duty to co-operate. Dr Imamovic contracted only with Energa and failed to produce viable offers or expenses. CGTL is not liable to Dr Imamovic under the contract or otherwise.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed