London Borough of Camden Council & Anor v Saint Benedict's Land Trust Ltd [2019] EWHC 3576 (Ch) (20 December 2019)
SBLT persistently issued meritless applications, posing ongoing risk of abuse; only a general civil restraint order is sufficient and proportionate. Summary assessment of costs is justified given the circumstances and objections raised by SBLT lack merit.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 3576 (Ch)
- Parties
- Creditor/respondent: London Borough of Camden Council; Creditor/respondent: Preston City Council; Debtor/appellant: Saint Benedict's Land Trust Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment, Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- General civil restraint order made against SBLT for two years; costs summarily assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Civil Restraint Orders, Costs Assessment, Abuse of Process, Non Domestic Rates Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Borough of Camden Council
Creditor/respondent
Preston City Council
Creditor/respondent
Saint Benedict's Land Trust Limited
Debtor/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment, Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a civil restraint order should be made against SBLT
- 2 Appropriate form and scope of civil restraint order
- 3 Summary assessment of costs
Ratio Decidendi
SBLT persistently issued meritless applications, posing ongoing risk of abuse; only a general civil restraint order is sufficient and proportionate. Summary assessment of costs is justified given the circumstances and objections raised by SBLT lack merit.
Court Disposition
General civil restraint order made against SBLT for two years; costs summarily assessed.
Orders
- General civil restraint order against SBLT for two years, requiring permission from Supperstone J for any claim/application in High Court or County Court.
- SBLT to pay LBC and PCC's costs summarily assessed at £20,040.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment