CJ v PC
The tribunal was correct to apply ordinary mitigation principles to compensation for loss arising from termination of employment, including setting off sums earned in alternative employment; there is no legal distinction between compensation for forced retirement and termination. The Parry v Cleaver principle was not argued below and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, as it would require reopening factual issues and is contrary to the principle of finality in litigation.
- Parties
- Appellant: CJ; Respondent: PC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Victimisation, Remedies, Mitigation of Loss, Pension Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CJ
Appellant
PC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law by setting off ill-health retirement pension against loss of earnings
- 2 Whether the Parry v Cleaver principle should have been applied to exclude pension from mitigation
- 3 Whether sums earned in alternative employment should be deducted from compensation
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal was correct to apply ordinary mitigation principles to compensation for loss arising from termination of employment, including setting off sums earned in alternative employment; there is no legal distinction between compensation for forced retirement and termination. The Parry v Cleaver principle was not argued below and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, as it would require reopening factual issues and is contrary to the principle of finality in litigation.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- permission to appeal refused
- no change to Employment Tribunal award
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment