Diamond Build Ltd v Clapham Park Homes Ltd
The Letter of Intent constituted a binding contract pending execution of the formal contract. The formal contract was never executed, so the Letter of Intent governed the parties' relationship. The cap in the Letter of Intent applied to the sums due. No estoppel arose to prevent the Defendant from relying on the Letter of Intent. The Claimant's claim is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Diamond Build Limited; Defendant: Clapham Park Homes Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction Contract Dispute) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Intent, Formation of Contract, Estoppel, Quantum Meruit, Construction Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diamond Build Limited
Claimant
Clapham Park Homes Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction Contract Dispute) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Letter of Intent constituted a binding contract or was superseded by a formal contract incorporating the JCT Intermediate Form of Building Contract, 2005 edition
- 2 Whether an estoppel arose preventing the Defendant from relying on the Letter of Intent
- 3 Whether the cap in the Letter of Intent applied to the sums due to the Claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The Letter of Intent constituted a binding contract pending execution of the formal contract. The formal contract was never executed, so the Letter of Intent governed the parties' relationship. The cap in the Letter of Intent applied to the sums due. No estoppel arose to prevent the Defendant from relying on the Letter of Intent. The Claimant's claim is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment