Clare Page v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The School was entitled to withhold the lesson materials under section 41 FOIA as they were provided in confidence, had the necessary quality of confidence, and disclosure would cause detriment to SoSE. The public interest in disclosure did not outweigh the duty of confidence, especially as parents could access the materials through a 'run-through' with SoSE. The School was also entitled to withhold the names of facilitators under section 40(2) FOIA as disclosure was not reasonably necessary for the legitimate interests identified, and those interests were met by existing statutory and website information. The School plausibly demonstrated that no further information was held within the...
- Parties
- Appellant: Clare Page; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: School of Sexuality Education
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Confidential Information, Personal Data, Education Policy, Parental Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clare Page
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
School of Sexuality Education
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the School was entitled to withhold lesson materials under section 41 FOIA (information provided in confidence)
- 2 Whether the School was entitled to withhold names of facilitators under section 40(2) FOIA (personal data)
- 3 Whether the School held further information within the scope of the request
Ratio Decidendi
The School was entitled to withhold the lesson materials under section 41 FOIA as they were provided in confidence, had the necessary quality of confidence, and disclosure would cause detriment to SoSE. The public interest in disclosure did not outweigh the duty of confidence, especially as parents could access the materials through a 'run-through' with SoSE. The School was also entitled to withhold the names of facilitators under section 40(2) FOIA as disclosure was not reasonably necessary for the legitimate interests identified, and those interests were met by existing statutory and website information. The School plausibly demonstrated that no further information was held within the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment