Emmanuel v Avison & Ors
The burden of proof lay with Ms Emmanuel as claimant seeking declarations of forgery and removal of the charge. The trial judge was entitled to resort to the burden of proof after finding the evidence inconclusive. No material error or deficiency in the judgment warranted appellate intervention or a retrial. The appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Claudia Zelena Emmanuel; Respondent: Andrew Avison; Respondent: Ginny Avison; Respondent: Glenrick White
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Forgery, Land Registration, Standard of Proof, Delay in Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claudia Zelena Emmanuel
Appellant
Andrew Avison
Respondent
Ginny Avison
Respondent
Glenrick White
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in resorting to the burden of proof to resolve the dispute over alleged forgery of signatures on loan and charge documents.
- 2 Whether the burden of proof was correctly placed on the claimant (Ms Emmanuel) or should have been on the respondents.
- 3 Whether the trial judge failed to make necessary findings of fact or gave inadequate reasons for his conclusions.
Ratio Decidendi
The burden of proof lay with Ms Emmanuel as claimant seeking declarations of forgery and removal of the charge. The trial judge was entitled to resort to the burden of proof after finding the evidence inconclusive. No material error or deficiency in the judgment warranted appellate intervention or a retrial. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment