Green Corns Ltd. v CLA Verley Group Ltd. & Anr [2005] EWHC 958 (QB) (18 May 2005)

Green Corns Ltd. v CLA Verley Group Ltd. & Anr [2005] EWHC 958 (QB) (18 May 2005)

The court held that the claimant was likely to establish at trial that publication of the addresses of its children's homes should not be allowed, as such publication constitutes misuse of private information and poses significant risks to vulnerable children. The public interest in freedom of expression and reporting on matters of public concern does not outweigh the paramount interests of the children in this context, particularly given statutory and regulatory restrictions and the sensitivity of the information. Accordingly, the interim injunction restraining publication was justified.

Citation
[2005] EWHC 958
Parties
Claimant: Green Corns Ltd; Defendant: Claverley Group Ltd; Defendant: Express and Star (Second Defendant)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction Application (queen's Bench Division) / Application for Interim Injunction Prior to Trial
Outcome
Interim injunction granted
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Freedom of Expression, Right to Privacy, Misuse of Private Information, Children's Rights, Public Interest Defence, Reporting Restrictions
Media Law Human Rights Law Privacy Law Child Law Interim Injunctions Freedom of Expression Right to Privacy Misuse of Private Information +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Green Corns Ltd

Claimant

Claverley Group Ltd

Defendant

Express and Star (Second Defendant)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interim Injunction Application (queen's Bench Division) / Application for Interim Injunction Prior to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an interim injunction should be granted to restrain publication of the addresses of children's homes operated by the claimant
  2. 2 Whether publication of such addresses constitutes misuse of private information or breach of confidence
  3. 3 How to balance Article 8 (right to privacy) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) ECHR in the context of media reporting on matters of public concern involving vulnerable children

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the claimant was likely to establish at trial that publication of the addresses of its children's homes should not be allowed, as such publication constitutes misuse of private information and poses significant risks to vulnerable children. The public interest in freedom of expression and reporting on matters of public concern does not outweigh the paramount interests of the children in this context, particularly given statutory and regulatory restrictions and the sensitivity of the information. Accordingly, the interim injunction restraining publication was justified.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction granted

Orders

  • Defendants are restrained from publishing the addresses or locations of any house owned, licensed, or being acquired by the claimant for occupation as a children's home, until trial or further order.