Palmer & Harvey McLane Ltd v Garrad & Anor [2013] EWHC 3810 (Ch) (04 December 2013)
The Settlement Agreement was intended to create legal relations and is enforceable. The evidence overwhelmingly supports P&H's case; the Garrads' arguments of sham and illegality are rejected. The counterclaims are unsubstantiated and fail. Judgment is entered for P&H for the sum claimed plus interest.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 3810 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Palmer & Harvey McLane Limited; Defendant: Clive Garrad; Defendant: Susan Garrad
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Settlement Agreements, Intention to Create Legal Relations, Illegality in Contract, Counterclaims for Unpaid Invoices, Personal Guarantees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Palmer & Harvey McLane Limited
Claimant
Clive Garrad
Defendant
Susan Garrad
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Settlement Agreement is enforceable against the Garrads
- 2 Whether the Settlement Agreement was a sham or illegal
- 3 Whether P&H owes sums claimed in the November invoices
Ratio Decidendi
The Settlement Agreement was intended to create legal relations and is enforceable. The evidence overwhelmingly supports P&H's case; the Garrads' arguments of sham and illegality are rejected. The counterclaims are unsubstantiated and fail. Judgment is entered for P&H for the sum claimed plus interest.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimant
Orders
- Judgment for Palmer & Harvey McLane Limited against Clive and Susan Garrad for £1,764,572.65 plus interest.
- Counterclaims dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment