Jefferson & Ors v Bailey
The judge's findings on credibility, supported by contemporaneous documents and cross-examination, established that Mr Bailey did not misappropriate the funds claimed, Mr Jefferson was aware of and participated in the fraud, and the appellants' claims lacked foundation; the appeal was dismissed as there was no basis to interfere with the trial judge's factual determinations.
- Parties
- Appellant: Clive Jefferson; Appellant: Robert Brown; Appellant: John Cantle; Appellant: Bruno Longo; Respondent: Richard Bailey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Misappropriation of Funds, Shareholding Disputes, Credibility of Witnesses, Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clive Jefferson
Appellant
Robert Brown
Appellant
John Cantle
Appellant
Bruno Longo
Appellant
Richard Bailey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Bailey misappropriated funds from investors
- 2 Whether Mr Jefferson was aware of and participated in the fraud
- 3 Entitlement to specific sums claimed by appellants
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's findings on credibility, supported by contemporaneous documents and cross-examination, established that Mr Bailey did not misappropriate the funds claimed, Mr Jefferson was aware of and participated in the fraud, and the appellants' claims lacked foundation; the appeal was dismissed as there was no basis to interfere with the trial judge's factual determinations.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment