R v Clive Lloyd
The overall custodial term of 14 years was manifestly excessive because insufficient allowance was made for the appellant's youth at the time of offending and the historic nature of the offences. The sentences on counts 4 and 6 were reduced to 3 years' custody and 1 year extended licence each, resulting in a total special custodial sentence of 16 years (12 years' custody, 4 years' extended licence).
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Clive Lloyd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Historic Offences, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Clive Lloyd
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the overall custodial sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the circumstances of the offences and the appellant's personal mitigation
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge made sufficient allowance for the appellant's youth at the time of offending and the historic nature of the offences
Ratio Decidendi
The overall custodial term of 14 years was manifestly excessive because insufficient allowance was made for the appellant's youth at the time of offending and the historic nature of the offences. The sentences on counts 4 and 6 were reduced to 3 years' custody and 1 year extended licence each, resulting in a total special custodial sentence of 16 years (12 years' custody, 4 years' extended licence).
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentences on counts 4 and 6 quashed and substituted with special custodial sentences of 3 years' custody and 1 year extended licence each, to run consecutively
- Total special custodial sentence reduced from 18 years to 16 years (12 years' custody, 4 years' extended licence)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment