CM v Blackburn With Darwen Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1479 (18 November 2014)
A court may make a placement order for adoption even where the local authority's care plan includes a dual track (adoption and long-term fostering) approach, provided the court determines, after a proper welfare and proportionality analysis, that adoption is required to safeguard the child's welfare. The existence of a contingency plan for long-term fostering does not undermine the primary decision for adoption, nor does it mean the statutory test is not met. The statutory test and the meaning of 'nothing else will do' have not changed; dual planning is permissible in appropriate cases.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 1479
- Parties
- Appellant: CM; First Respondent: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council; Second Respondent (by Her Children's Guardian): M (A Child)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Placement Order Made by Preston County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Placement Orders, Care Proceedings, Parental Consent, Proportionality, Dual Planning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CM
Appellant
Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council
First Respondent
M (A Child)
Second Respondent (by Her Children's Guardian)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Placement Order Made by Preston County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a placement order for adoption can be made when the local authority's care plan includes a dual (adoption and long-term fostering) track
- 2 Whether the statutory test for dispensing with parental consent to adoption is affected by dual planning
- 3 Proper interpretation of 'nothing else will do' in the context of adoption
Ratio Decidendi
A court may make a placement order for adoption even where the local authority's care plan includes a dual track (adoption and long-term fostering) approach, provided the court determines, after a proper welfare and proportionality analysis, that adoption is required to safeguard the child's welfare. The existence of a contingency plan for long-term fostering does not undermine the primary decision for adoption, nor does it mean the statutory test is not met. The statutory test and the meaning of 'nothing else will do' have not changed; dual planning is permissible in appropriate cases.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Placement order for adoption upheld
- No change to the care plan or placement order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment