CM v CM [2019] EWFC 16 (01 March 2019)
The court held that the letter of instruction to the expert accountant must follow the form drafted by the Respondent's solicitors, as it reflected the court's prior order. The Applicant's amendments were inappropriate and unjustified. The Applicant is responsible for the costs of the cross-applications.
- Citation
- [2019] EWFC 16
- Parties
- Applicant: CM; Respondent: CM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Family Court Financial Remedy Proceedings / Cross Applications Regarding Letter of Instruction to Expert Accountant
- Outcome
- Applicant's cross-application dismissed; Respondent's application granted
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Financial Remedy, Costs, Arbitration in Family Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CM
Applicant
CM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Court Financial Remedy Proceedings / Cross Applications Regarding Letter of Instruction to Expert Accountant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendments to the letter of instruction to the expert accountant were appropriate
- 2 Whether the Applicant or Respondent should bear the costs of the cross-applications
- 3 Whether parties or their advisors may attend meetings with the expert accountant
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the letter of instruction to the expert accountant must follow the form drafted by the Respondent's solicitors, as it reflected the court's prior order. The Applicant's amendments were inappropriate and unjustified. The Applicant is responsible for the costs of the cross-applications.
Court Disposition
Applicant's cross-application dismissed; Respondent's application granted
Orders
- Letter of instruction to expert accountant to proceed in the form drafted by Respondent's solicitors, with Applicant's solicitor permitted to observe meetings as an observer only.
- Applicant to pay Respondent's costs of the cross-applications on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment