Marketmaker Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd & Ors v CMC Group Plc & Ors [2009] EWHC 1445 (QB) (24 June 2009)
Mr. Taher was in contempt of court as at the date of the application notice for intentional and deliberate breaches of his undertaking to disclose documents in specified categories relating to his means, as the obligation was clear, continuing, and not discharged by subsequent partial compliance.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1445
- Parties
- Claimant: Marketmaker Technology (Beijing) Co Limited (now Forex Asia (Beijing) Management Ltd and formerly Xi Yin Online (Beijing) Technology Ltd); Claimant: Obair Group International Corporation; Claimant: Forex Technology Corporation; Claimant: Naser Taher; Defendant: CMC Group PLC; Defendant: CMC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd; Defendant: Peter Cruddas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application (civil) / Judgment on Committal Application
- Outcome
- Findings of contempt of court against Mr. Naser Taher for breaches as at the date of the application notice in specified categories; further submissions invited on penalty.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Undertaking, Disclosure Obligations, Enforcement of Costs Orders, Committal for Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marketmaker Technology (Beijing) Co Limited (now Forex Asia (Beijing) Management Ltd and formerly Xi Yin Online (Beijing) Technology Ltd)
Claimant
Obair Group International Corporation
Claimant
Forex Technology Corporation
Claimant
Naser Taher
Claimant
CMC Group PLC
Defendant
CMC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd
Defendant
Peter Cruddas
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application (civil) / Judgment on Committal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Naser Taher was in contempt of court for failing to comply with an undertaking to disclose documents relating to his means.
- 2 Whether breaches of the undertaking as at the date of the application notice constituted contempt.
- 3 Whether subsequent breaches post-dating the application notice could be the subject of contempt findings.
Ratio Decidendi
Mr. Taher was in contempt of court as at the date of the application notice for intentional and deliberate breaches of his undertaking to disclose documents in specified categories relating to his means, as the obligation was clear, continuing, and not discharged by subsequent partial compliance.
Court Disposition
Findings of contempt of court against Mr. Naser Taher for breaches as at the date of the application notice in specified categories; further submissions invited on penalty.
Orders
- Mr. Taher found in contempt of court for breaches in categories 1, 2, 4, 8.1, 9.1, 9.8, and 11 as at 21 August 2007.
- Mr. Taher remains under a continuing obligation to comply with the undertaking; further orders to be determined after submissions on penalty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment