CMOC Sales & Marketing Ltd v Person(s) Unknown & Ors

CMOC Sales & Marketing Ltd v Person(s) Unknown & Ors

The injunctions are continued because the defendants have not engaged with the proceedings or complied with asset disclosure obligations, and the applicant has satisfied the court as to material disclosure.

Parties
Applicant: CMOC Sales & Marketing Limited; Defendant: Person(s) Unknown; Defendant: Juan Carlos Carrasco Garcia; Defendant: Lucy Mary Zorrilla Romero; Defendant: Vicente Garcia Romero; Defendant: Nadezda Dautova; Defendant: International Range Trading UG; Defendant: Universal Youth Trading Co Limited; Defendant: Gee Boo Trading Company Limited; Defendant: Nuanyan Trading Co Limited; Defendant: Various Banks
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Continuation of Injunctions
Outcome
Injunctions continued until trial or further order
Legal Topics
Freezing Injunctions, Asset Disclosure, Service of Process
Commercial Law Civil Procedure Freezing Injunctions Asset Disclosure Service of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CMOC Sales & Marketing Limited

Applicant

Person(s) Unknown

Defendant

Juan Carlos Carrasco Garcia

Defendant

Lucy Mary Zorrilla Romero

Defendant

Vicente Garcia Romero

Defendant

Nadezda Dautova

Defendant

International Range Trading UG

Defendant

Universal Youth Trading Co Limited

Defendant

Gee Boo Trading Company Limited

Defendant

Nuanyan Trading Co Limited

Defendant

Various Banks

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Continuation of Injunctions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to continue existing injunctions against defendants who have not engaged with the claim
  2. 2 Whether material disclosure obligations have been met by the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The injunctions are continued because the defendants have not engaged with the proceedings or complied with asset disclosure obligations, and the applicant has satisfied the court as to material disclosure.

Court Disposition

Injunctions continued until trial or further order

Orders

  • Existing injunctions continued against all defendants until trial or further order
  • Material disclosure by applicant accepted as sufficient for current orders