CN, FN & DW. R.
The judge's decisions on evidence and jury directions were legally sound and did not prejudice the appellants; the convictions are safe. However, the minimum terms imposed were manifestly excessive given the appellants' ages and circumstances, requiring reduction.
- Parties
- Appellant: CN; Appellant: FN; Appellant: DW; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals against conviction dismissed; appeals against sentence allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Joint Enterprise, Accessory Liability, Bad Character Evidence, Sentencing of Juveniles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CN
Appellant
FN
Appellant
DW
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 admissibility of previous convictions as bad character evidence
- 2 admissibility of covert recordings
- 3 adequacy of jury directions on accessory liability
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's decisions on evidence and jury directions were legally sound and did not prejudice the appellants; the convictions are safe. However, the minimum terms imposed were manifestly excessive given the appellants' ages and circumstances, requiring reduction.
Court Disposition
Appeals against conviction dismissed; appeals against sentence allowed in part.
Orders
- Minimum term for CN and FN reduced to 14 years.
- Minimum term for DW reduced to 16 years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment