Co-Operative Group (CWS) Ltd v International Computers Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 1955 (19 December 2003)

Co-Operative Group (CWS) Ltd v International Computers Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 1955 (19 December 2003)

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge's findings regarding CWS's motives and credibility, which were not put to witnesses and were unsupported by the evidence or the respondent's case, rendered the trial unfair. The judge's 'conspiracy theory' pervaded the judgment and tainted the findings, making it...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Civ 1955
Parties
Appellant: CO-OPERATIVE GROUP (CWS) Ltd.; Respondent: INTERNATIONAL COMPUTERS Ltd.
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Technology & Construction Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; retrial ordered
Legal Topics
Contract Formation, Repudiatory Breach, Misrepresentation, Damages, Fair Trial, Judicial Bias
Contract Law Commercial Law Information Technology Law Contract Formation Repudiatory Breach Misrepresentation Damages Fair Trial +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CO-OPERATIVE GROUP (CWS) Ltd.

Appellant

INTERNATIONAL COMPUTERS Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Technology & Construction Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's findings and conduct rendered the trial unfair and necessitated a retrial
  2. 2 Whether there was a binding contract between CWS and ICL for the Globalstore project
  3. 3 Whether ICL was in repudiatory breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge's findings regarding CWS's motives and credibility, which were not put to witnesses and were unsupported by the evidence or the respondent's case, rendered the trial unfair. The judge's 'conspiracy theory' pervaded the judgment and tainted the findings, making it impossible to isolate untainted findings. The judgment was fundamentally unfair and a retrial was necessary.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; retrial ordered

Orders

  • The judgment of the Technology and Construction Court is set aside.
  • The case is remitted for retrial before a different judge.