Coats UK Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd v Styles & Ors
The 2008 Deed validly modified Rule 17.6 of the 2004 Rules under section 68 of the Pensions Act 1995, thereby limiting annual pension increases to the higher of 3% or RPI and removing entitlement to 5% increases from 4 February 2008. The deed was not invalidated by accrued rights protections or the Transfer Agreement.
- Parties
- Appellant: Coats UK Pension Scheme Trustees Limited; First Respondent: Alan Roland Styles; Second Respondent: Roderick Donald Armitage; Third Respondent: Richard Edward Brown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Modification of Pension Scheme Rules, Accrued Rights, Statutory Powers, Interpretation of Trust Deeds, Transitional Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coats UK Pension Scheme Trustees Limited
Appellant
Alan Roland Styles
First Respondent
Roderick Donald Armitage
Second Respondent
Richard Edward Brown
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents are entitled to annual pension increases of 5% after 4 February 2008
- 2 Effectiveness and validity of the 2008 Deed under section 68 of the Pensions Act 1995
- 3 Interpretation of scheme rules and Inland Revenue Limits
Ratio Decidendi
The 2008 Deed validly modified Rule 17.6 of the 2004 Rules under section 68 of the Pensions Act 1995, thereby limiting annual pension increases to the higher of 3% or RPI and removing entitlement to 5% increases from 4 February 2008. The deed was not invalidated by accrued rights protections or the Transfer Agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Respondents are not entitled to annual pension increases of 5% from 4 February 2008.
- Annual increases are limited to the higher of 3% or RPI as per Rule 17.6 of the 2004 Rules as modified by the 2008 Deed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment